Ethics Reporting Hotlines: The Key to Avoiding Financial Fraud
Having a safe, secure and reliable reporting system for employees to use will help ensure that wrongdoing is reported while whistleblowers are protected.
Having a safe, secure and reliable reporting system for employees to use will help ensure that wrongdoing is reported while whistleblowers are protected.
By: Shannon Walker
Human Resource teams are the gatekeepers of organizations as they are responsible for the vital screening process of every employee. The nature of the job demands the HR team be connected to each employee in some capacity. However, many may not hear from HR until they are involved with wrongdoing – either as a victim, perpetrator or witness.
Occupational fraud is just one form of wrongdoing that can plague workplaces and create extensive investigations for human resource departments. However, in many fraud cases, another employee tips HR off internally. Here, the department is also responsible for protecting this reporter's anonymity when possible and ensuring they can return to work without repercussions from management or co-workers. Having a safe, secure and reliable reporting system for employees to use will help ensure that wrongdoing is reported while whistleblowers are protected.
In the fall of 2022, the CBC reported that more than half a million dollars was lost from a Manitoba municipalities bank account. The details of the report state a suspected internal breach through multiple e-transfers led to a significant loss over the course of two years. The duration and corresponding loss for the case in Manitoba is not out of the ordinary. In fact, a typical case of occupational fraud lasts a year before it is detected, and the median loss for cases in 2022 was approximately $117,000.
Cases of fraud in the workplace can range from activities including check tampering, payroll fraud, vendor fraud, theft and false expense claims, among others. While any of these activities will be a hit on the organization, they can also become a threat or danger to employees who accidentally witness wrongdoing. It is in everyone's best interest that fraud is reported as soon as possible, and HR personnel are responsible for fostering a space that allows employees to speak up.
When implementing an ethics hotline, you can choose to either operate in-house or outsource the monitoring and auditing to a third-party operator. The size and organizational structure of your company will help determine which option is best for you. Smaller organizations may benefit from the more cost-effective option of operating in-house, while larger organizations may benefit from outsourcing as it is a more scalable solution.
Either way, there are a few keys to success when implementing an ethics hotline in any organization, big or small. Awareness, accessibility, alternatives and anti-retaliation policies will be crucial for ensuring the effective implementation of an ethics hotline.
Awareness refers to the need for employees to know about the reporting tool and how and when to use it. When introducing a new ethics reporting tool, be sure to have a training seminar with employees and integrate it into the orientation process for new hires.
Accessibility will be essential for ensuring the reporting tool is used in a timely manner. When employees can access the system from anywhere in the world, any day of the year and preferably speak in their native tongue, they will be more likely to use the service.
Alternatives are often necessary to ensure everyone is comfortable with making a report. While hotlines are the traditional method for reporting, in 2022, email and web tips, both surpassed hotlines as more common methods for reporting. Having an omnichannel system for reporting will further facilitate accessibility and encourage speaking up.
An anti-retaliation policy will give your human resource team the authority to have zero tolerance for those who retaliate against employees for speaking up. Retaliation may come in the form of ostracization, bullying and harassment. This policy should require swift action and have no exemptions, meaning even senior executives will be held accountable if they retaliate against a whistleblower.